Below is an example of the scoring rubric for the presentations accompanying the homework.
| Dimension | Sophisticated | Good Work | Competant | Needs improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presentation (35) | Presents clearly and effectively; the logic of the presentation is easy to follow; very well prepared. (30-35) | Nice presentation style, but rushes through the material a bit. Logic is easy to follow. (20-29) | Discusses the music adequately, but could focus the discussion a bit more; rushes through the material a bit. (10-19) | Description is vague, unclear that there was more than a passive engagement with the music. (0-9) |
| Supplemental Materials (30) | Makes excellent use of audio/visual resources; provides handouts that are clear and informative. (25-30) | Materials are clear, but could be improved; slides are a little difficult to read; the talk and the materials complement each other nicely. (15-24) | Materials contain good info, but lack clarity; slides might be difficult to read; the talk could engage more with the materials. (5-14) | No supplemental materials. (0-4) |
| Dialogue and Q&A session (35) | Engages with the audience; asks questions that foster discussion; answers questions in a respectful and thoughtful manner. (30-35) | Engages with the audience, but questions could better crafted to foster dialogue. Answers questions well. (20-29) | Asks only a few questions, could engage with the audience a bit more.(10-19) | Does not engage with the audience; answers to questions could be better thought-out. (0-9) |