Scoring Rubric for Presentations
===================================================

Below is an example of the scoring rubric for the presentations accompanying the homework.



+---------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+               
|Dimension      | Sophisticated                 | Good Work                     | Competant                     | Needs improvement             |
+===============+===============================+===============================+===============================+===============================+
| Presentation  | Presents clearly and          | Nice presentation style,      | Discusses the music           | Description is vague,         |                                     
| (35)          | effectively; the logic of the | but rushes through            | adequately, but could focus   | unclear that there was more   |
|               | presentation is easy to       | the material a bit.           | the discussion a bit more;    | than a passive engagement     |
|               | follow; very well prepared.   | Logic is easy to follow.      | rushes through the material a | with the music. (0-9)         |
|               | (30-35)                       | (20-29)                       | bit. (10-19)                  |                               |
+---------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+               
| Supplemental  | Makes excellent use of        | Materials are clear, but could| Materials contain good info,  | No supplemental materials.    | 
| Materials     | audio/visual resources;       | be improved; slides are a     | but lack clarity; slides might| (0-4)                         |
| (30)          | provides handouts that are    | little difficult to read;     | be difficult to read;         |                               |
|               | clear and informative. (25-30)| the talk and the materials    | the talk could engage more    |                               |                             
|               |                               | complement each other nicely. | with the materials. (5-14)    |                               |
|               |                               | (15-24)                       |                               |                               |
+---------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+               
| Dialogue and  | Engages with the audience;    | Engages with the audience, but| Asks only a few questions,    | Does not engage with the      |
| Q\&A session  | asks questions that foster    | questions could better crafted| could engage with the audience| audience; answers to questions|
| (35)          | discussion; answers questions | to foster dialogue. Answers   | a bit more.(10-19)            | could be better thought-out.  |
|               | in a respectful and thoughtful| questions well. (20-29)       |                               | (0-9)                         |
|               | manner. (30-35)               |                               |                               |                               |
|               |                               |                               |                               |                               |
|               |                               |                               |                               |                               |
|               |                               |                               |                               |                               |
|               |                               |                               |                               |                               |
+---------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+