Thursday, January 6th, 2022
Today we will be covering…
Empiricism isn’t a method, it’s just a smart thing to do.
–Gjerdingen (2011, SMT)
In short, there is no useful distinction to be drawn between empirical and non-empirical musicology, because there can be no such thing as a truly non-empirical musicology; what is at issue is the extent to which musicological discourse is grounded on empirical observation, and conversely the extent to which observation is regulated by discourse.
–Cook and Clarke (2004, p.3)
“…there would be grounds for legitimate criticism if musicologists working in data-rich fields did not take full advantage of the methds available under such conditions, instead restricting themselves to traditional”humanities” approaches developed for data-poor fields–and oe of the messages of this book is that musicology i or could be, in many instances, a significantly “data richer” field than we generally give it credit for.”
–Cook and Clarke, (p.4)
Empirical musicology, to summarize, can be thought of as musicology that embodies a principled awareness of both the potential to engage with large bodies of relevant data, and the appropriate methods of achieving this […]
– Cook and Clarke (2004, p.5)
Methodological reductionism is not philosophoical reductionism.
Philosophical Reductionism: A Belief about the World
Methodological Reductionism: A Strategy for Discovery
In research, reductionism is a method, not a belief
We simplify problems, not because we believe problems to be simple, but because we believe problems to be complex.
Listening to Mozart makes people smarter.
Concept | Possible operationalization |
“smarter” | will score higher on the Stanford-Binet IQ test |
“Mozart” | all sound recordings that claim the music is composed by W.A. Mozart |
“listening” | conscious while being exposed to 20 minutes of sound recordings |
“people” | 2nd-year undergraduate music students from the Northwestern University |
See this page on types of studies