Scoring Rubric for Listening Comparisons =================================================== Below is an example of the scoring rubric for the 500 word listening comparisons. +---------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ |Dimension | Sophisticated | Good Work | Competant | Needs improvement | +===============+===============================+===============================+===============================+===============================+ | Engagement | Actively engages with the | Engages with the music, but | Discusses the music | Description is vague, | | with the | music; attempts to understand | the focus is | adequately, but could focus | unclear that there was more | | music (50) | the basic underpinnings of | disproportionately on one | more on this area; focuses on | than a passive engagement | | | the pieces; examines musical | piece. Does a good job at | superficial musical elements; | with the music. The comparison| | | relationships between the | examining the similarities \& | comparison needs to discuss | between the works fails to go | | | pieces in a sophisticated | differences in the approaches | the relationship (or lack | beyond basic historical | | | manner. (45-50) | of each piece. (35-44) | thereof) between the pieces | facts. (0-19) | | | | | in more depth. (20-34) | | +---------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | Historical | Shows a sophisticated | Shows a decent understanding | Shows a slightly uneven | Does not provide context for | | Context (30) | understanding of the relevant | of the relevant culture, | understanding of the relevant | the music; it his clear | | | culture, genre, and topic. | genre, and topic, but it | culture, genre, and topic, | that there exist many | | | (25-30) | could be improved. (20-24) | and it is clear that there | misunderstandings about the | | | | | are a few misconceptions. | topic. (0-9) | | | | | (10-19) | | +---------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | Writing (20)| Coherently organized | Paper is well organized | Only a few spelling or | Contains a number of spelling | | | and has a natural flow and | overall, and the argument is | grammatical errors, but the | and grammatical errors; | | | logic. There are no | easy to follow. There are | logic is difficult to follow. | the argument needs work; | | | grammatical or spelling | only a few minor spelling | The overall argument could be | the logic is very difficult | | | mistakes, and the writing is | or grammatical errors; writing| improved. (5-9) | to follow. (0-4) | | | clear and persuasive. (15-20) | is clear but the structure | | | | | | and logic could use a bit of | | | | | | improvement.(10-14) | | | | | | | | | +---------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+